This Article Full Text (OnlineFirst[PDF]) All Versions of this Article: 0162243907306699v1 33/4/529    most recent Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Google Scholar Articles by Konopásek, Z. Articles by Zamykalová, L. Social Bookmarking                   What's this?

Making Pure Science and Pure Politics: On the Expertise of Bypass and the Bypass of Expertise

¹ Charles University in Prague / Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic
² Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic
³ Charles University in Prague

^* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: zdenek{at}konopasek.net.

	Abstract

This article is based on a case study of a long-term public controversy over the construction of a highway bypass (around Plzen, Czech Republic). Two principal variants of the bypass were proposed. One of them began gradually to appear preferable, increasingly attractive for experts, but remaining only on paper. In the meantime, however, the other variant became more realistic, pushed through mainly by local politicians and actually constructed. This article shows how purification of science from politics (and vice versa) played a key role in the development and ending of the case. Initial expertization of the case switched to its sharp politicization, when people got frustrated from protraction and indecisive evidence of accumulated expertise. This turned to be fatal for those who consistently staked everything on "pure facts." This article concludes by outlining some general consequences of such a development for both democratic decision making and the political relevance of expertise.

CiteULike    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    What's this?