Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here to sign up for SAGE Journal Email Alerts today!

Science, Technology & Human Values
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Bauer, H. H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

Barriers Against Interdisciplinarity: Implications for Studies of Science, Technology, and Society (STS

Henry H. Bauer

Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University

Interdisciplinary work is intractable because the search for knowledge in different fields entails different interests, and thereby different values too; and the different possibilities of knowledge about different subjects also lead to different epistemologies. Thus differ ences among practitioners of the various disciplines are pervasive and aptly described as cultural ones, and interdisciplinary work requires transcending unconscious habits of thought. The more those unconscious habits are explicated and the more we under stand how the disparate characteristics of the various intellectual cultures are related to the necessarily different interests, values, and epistemologies, the more feasible becomes the goal of transcending thought habits. Two sorts of interdisciplinary effort seem to have been successful: specific, delimited problems have been solved by teams in what is actually multidisciplinary rather than interdisciplinary work, and new disciplines have sprung up at the intersections of existing ones. STS fits neither of those patterns. Can it nevertheless be viable?

Science, Technology & Human Values, Vol. 15, No. 1, 105-119 (1990)
DOI: 10.1177/016224399001500110


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Science Technology Human ValuesHome page
E. Duncker
Symbolic Communication in Multidisciplinary Cooperations
Science Technology Human Values, July 1, 2001; 26(3): 349 - 386.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Science CommunicationHome page
D. Indyk and D. A. Rier
Grassroots AIDS Knowledge: Implications for the Boundaries of Science and Collective Action
Science Communication, September 1, 1993; 15(1): 3 - 43.
[Abstract]


Home page
Science CommunicationHome page
J. P. Boggs
Implicit Models of Social Knowledge Use
Science Communication, September 1, 1992; 14(1): 29 - 62.
[Abstract]