Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here to sign up for SAGE Journal Email Alerts today!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Science, Technology & Human Values
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Sætnan, A. R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Rigid Politics and Technological Flexibility: The Anatomy of a Failed Hospital Innovation

Ann Rudinow Sætnan

University of Trondheim

Conventionally, technologies are seen as rigid, immutable; social systems as malleable. Constructivist theories of technology, such as actor network theory, have corrected that view. Technologies are flexible, reinterpretable. Often that flexibility is alleged to explain their success in transforming social systems. This article presents the story of PREOP—a flexible technology that met with an immutable social system and failed to become what was expected of it. The article contrasts two interpretations of the story, an actor network version and a labor process version. Drawing on elements of the labor process version, the author suggests that preexisting networks be brought more into focus in actor network analyses, that the role of conflict in networks be acknowledged, and that flexibility be examined in more detail.

Science, Technology & Human Values, Vol. 16, No. 4, 419-447 (1991)
DOI: 10.1177/016224399101600401


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Science Technology Human ValuesHome page
J. Novek
It, Gender, and Professional Practice: Or, Why an Automated Drug Distribution System Was Sent Back to the Manufacturer
Science Technology Human Values, July 1, 2002; 27(3): 379 - 403.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Science Technology Human ValuesHome page
M. Berg
The Politics of Technology: On Bringing Social Theory into Technological Design
Science Technology Human Values, October 1, 1998; 23(4): 456 - 490.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Science Technology Human ValuesHome page
A. Clarke and T. Montini
The Many Faces of RU486: Tales of Situated Knowledges and Technological Contestations
Science Technology Human Values, January 1, 1993; 18(1): 42 - 78.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Science Technology Human ValuesHome page
R. Kling
When Gunfire Shatters Bone: Reducing Sociotechnical Systems to Social Relationships
Science Technology Human Values, July 1, 1992; 17(3): 381 - 385.
[PDF]