Science, Technology & Human Values

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Register here to gain access to SAGE's 500+ Journals Online

Click here to sign up for SAGE Journal Email Alerts today!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Sorensen, K. H.
Right arrow Articles by Levold, N.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Science, Technology & Human Values, Vol. 17, No. 1, 13-35 (1992)
DOI: 10.1177/016224399201700102

Tacit Networks, Heterogeneous Engineers, and Embodied Technology

Knut H. Sorensen

University of Trondheim

Nora Levold

University of Trondheim

Social studies of science and technology are dominated by action and macro approaches. This has led to a neglect of institutions and institutional arrangements at the meso level, which are important, in particular to the student of technology. The transfer of concepts and methods from social studies of science to technology studies has conserved this lack of concern with the meso level. This article suggests a more critical evaluation of this transfer, along with a review of the now popular assumption of a high degree of similarity between science and technology. Two case studies show how meso-level considerations are important to an understanding of the nature of technological innovation and illustrate the lack of similarity between scientific and technological development.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Science Technology Human ValuesHome page
F. W. Geels
Transformations of Large Technical Systems: A Multilevel Analysis of the Dutch Highway System (1950-2000)
Science Technology Human Values, March 1, 2007; 32(2): 123 - 149.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
EDUCATIONAL RESEARCHERHome page
M. K. McGinn and W.-M. Roth
Preparing Students for Competent Scientific Practice: Implications of Recent Research in Science and Technology Studies
Educational Researcher, April 1, 1999; 28(3): 14 - 24.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Science Technology Human ValuesHome page
B. Truffer and G. Durrenberger
Outsider Initiatives in the Reconstruction of the Car: The Case of Lightweight Vehicle Milieus in Switzerland
Science Technology Human Values, April 1, 1997; 22(2): 207 - 234.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Bulletin of Science Technology SocietyHome page
G. Fourez, P. Mathy, and V. Englebert-Lecomte
A Model for Interdisciplinary Work
Bulletin of Science Technology Society, January 1, 1997; 17(2-3): 95 - 104.
[PDF]


Home page
Science Technology Human ValuesHome page
W.-M. Roth, M. K. McGinn, and G.M. Bowen
Applications of Science and Technology Studies: Effecting Change in Science Education
Science Technology Human Values, October 1, 1996; 21(4): 454 - 484.
[Abstract] [PDF]