|
Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
|
Representing Uncertainty in Global Climate Change Science and Policy: Boundary-Ordering Devices and Authority
Simon Shackley
Lancaster University
Brian Wynne
Lancaster University
This article argues that, in public and policy contexts, the ways in which many scientists talk about uncertainty in simulations of future climate change not only facilitates communications and cooperation between scientific and policy communities but also affects the perceived authority of science. Uncertainty tends to challenge the authority of chmate science, especially if it is used for policy making, but the relationship between authority and uncertainty is not simply an inverse one. In policy contexts, many scientists are compelled to talk about uncertainty but do not wish to imply that uncertainty is a serious challenge to the authority of scientific knowledge or to its substantial use in policy making. "Boundary-ordering devices, " the contextual discursive attempts to reconcile uncertainty and authority in science, depend critically for their success on their "dual" interpretation: at a general level across a boundary and differently on either side of it. The authors empirically identify a range of such boundary-ordering devices in the climate field.
Science, Technology & Human Values, Vol. 21, No. 3,
275-302 (1996)
DOI: 10.1177/016224399602100302
 CiteULike  Complore  Connotea  Del.icio.us  Digg  Reddit  Technorati  Twitter What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
|
|
 
R. Barke
Balancing Uncertain Risks and Benefits in Human Subjects Research
Science Technology Human Values,
May 1, 2009;
34(3):
337 - 364.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
D. G. E. Liverman
Environmental geoscience; communication challenges
Geological Society, London, Special Publications,
January 1, 2008;
305(1):
197 - 209.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
M. Sundberg
Parameterizations as Boundary Objects on the Climate Arena
Social Studies of Science,
June 1, 2007;
37(3):
473 - 488.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
M. Lahsen
Seductive Simulations? Uncertainty Distribution Around Climate Models
Social Studies of Science,
December 1, 2005;
35(6):
895 - 922.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
C. Kwa
Local Ecologies and Global Science: Discourses and Strategies of the International Geosphere-Biosphere Programme
Social Studies of Science,
December 1, 2005;
35(6):
923 - 950.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
J. B. Corbett and J. L. Durfee
Testing Public (Un)Certainty of Science: Media Representations of Global Warming
Science Communication,
December 1, 2004;
26(2):
129 - 151.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
D. H. Guston
Boundary Organizations in Environmental Policy and Science: An Introduction
Science Technology Human Values,
October 1, 2001;
26(4):
399 - 408.
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
S. Agrawala, K. Broad, and D. H. Guston
Integrating Climate Forecasts and Societal Decision Making: Challenges to an Emergent Boundary Organization
Science Technology Human Values,
October 1, 2001;
26(4):
454 - 477.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
G. Edmond
The Law-Set: The Legal-Scientific Production of Medical Propriety
Science Technology Human Values,
April 1, 2001;
26(2):
191 - 226.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
M. E. Goncalves
The Importance of Being European: The Science and Politics of BSE in Portugal
Science Technology Human Values,
October 1, 2000;
25(4):
417 - 448.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
G. R. Mitchell
Whose Shoe Fits Best? Dubious Physics and Power Politics in the TMD Footprint Controversy
Science Technology Human Values,
January 1, 2000;
25(1):
52 - 86.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
S. Yearley
Computer Models and the Public's Understanding of Science: A Case-Study Analysis
Social Studies of Science,
December 1, 1999;
29(6):
845 - 866.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
S. H. STOCKING
On Drawing Attention to Ignorance
Science Communication,
September 1, 1998;
20(1):
165 - 178.
[Abstract]
|
|
|
|
|
