This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Oudshoorn, N. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

On Masculinities, Technologies, and Pain: The Testing of Male Contraceptives in the Clinic and the Media

University of Amsterdam, Universite Twente

In the last fifteen years, testing has attracted much attention in science and technology studies. Most researchers have focused almost exclusively on testing in the laboratory, specifically designed test locations, and, for medical technologies, the clinic. What counts as testing has largely been described in terms of the activities of scientific experts. This is not to say that science and technology studies have completely neglected other institutional discourses. Journalistic texts have been a favorite research site for scholars in science and technology studies, particularly those seeking to understand the dynamics of public controversies on science and technology. Although most constructivist studies of science and media relations have treated journalistic texts as secondary to scientific texts, other scholars have dismissed this hierarchy. In this article, scientific texts and journalistic texts are considered equally important locations in which to analyze the testing of technologies. Based on a case study on the testing of a new contraceptive technology for men, the article shows that what counts as successful testing is not solely in the hands of scientific experts. In the case of male contraceptive technologies, journalists have contested the claims of scientific experts, particularly their claims about the cultural feasibility of the new technology.

Science, Technology & Human Values, Vol. 24, No. 2, 265-289 (1999)
DOI: 10.1177/016224399902400204


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				P. Schyfter Tackling the `Body Inescapable' in Sport: Body--Artifact Kinesthetics, Embodied Skill and the Community of Practice in Lacrosse Masculinity Body Society, September 1, 2008; 14(3): 81 - 103. [PDF]

				D. J. Hess Technology- and Product-Oriented Movements: Approximating Social Movement Studies and Science and Technology Studies Science Technology Human Values, October 1, 2005; 30(4): 515 - 535. [Abstract] [PDF]

				M. Lohan and W. Faulkner Masculinities and Technologies: Some Introductory Remarks Men and Masculinities, April 1, 2004; 6(4): 319 - 329. [PDF]

				N. Oudshoorn, E. Rommes, and M. Stienstra Configuring the User as Everybody: Gender and Design Cultures in Information and Communication Technologies Science Technology Human Values, January 1, 2004; 29(1): 30 - 63. [Abstract] [PDF]