Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

CiteULike is a free service for managing and discovering scholarly references - click here to get started.

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Science, Technology & Human Values
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Barns, I.
Right arrow Articles by Shaw, R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

"What Do You Think about Genetic Medicine?" Facilitating Sociable Public Discourse on Developments in the New Genetics

Ian Barns

Murdoch University

Renato Schibeci

Murdoch University

Aidan Davison

Murdoch University

Robyn Shaw

Murdoch University

An important aspect of any meaningful public discussion about developments in gene technology is the provision of opportunities for interested publics to engage in sociable public discourse with other lay people and with experts. This article reports on a series of peer group conversations conducted in late 1996 and early 1997 with sixteen community groups in Perth, Western Australia, interested in gene therapy technology. With the case of cystic fibrosis as a particular focus, and using background resource material as a stimulus for discussion, the participating groups explored a range of value issues arising from the new genetic medicine. This more discursive context enabled participants to express a number of background or life-world concerns about genetic medicine, concerns that are often obscured by the dominant biomedical and bioethical discourses.

Science, Technology & Human Values, Vol. 25, No. 3, 283-308 (2000)
DOI: 10.1177/016224390002500302


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Science Technology Human ValuesHome page
J. F. Caron-Flinterman, J. E. W. Broerse, and J. F. G. Bunders
Patient Partnership in Decision-Making on Biomedical Research: Changing the Network
Science Technology Human Values, May 1, 2007; 32(3): 339 - 368.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
J Health PsycholHome page
E. Chapman
The Social and Ethical Implications of Changing Medical Technologies: The Views of People Living with Genetic Conditions
J Health Psychol, March 1, 2002; 7(2): 195 - 206.
[Abstract] [PDF]