Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

CiteULike is a free service for managing and discovering scholarly references - click here to get started.

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Science, Technology & Human Values
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Cohen, L.
Right arrow Articles by Duberley, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Continuity in Discontinuity: Changing Discourses of Science in a Market Economy

Laurie Cohen

Loughborough University

John McAuley

Sheffield Hallam University

Joanne Duberley

University of Sheffield

There is an emerging consensus that we are experiencing radical change in the way that science is organized and performed. Frequently described as a shift from Mode 1 to Mode 2, this view emphasizes application, transdisciplinarity, collaboration, and accountability. This article examines the ways in which U.K. public sector scientists make sense of scientific endeavor. The data reveal that the extent to which science is being constructed varied both across and between institutions. Data highlight how individual scientists weave their own paths through the changing discourses of science, constructing new understandings that do not fit neatly into any binary framework for understanding.

Science, Technology & Human Values, Vol. 26, No. 2, 145-166 (2001)
DOI: 10.1177/016224390102600202
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Science Technology Human ValuesHome page
M. Albert and S. Laberge
The Legitimation and Dissemination Processes of the Innovation System Approach: The Case of the Canadian and Quebec Science and Technology Policy
Science Technology Human Values, March 1, 2007; 32(2): 221 - 249.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 Science Technology Human ValuesHome page
T. Hellstrom and M. Jacob
Taming Unruly Science and Saving National Competitiveness: Discourses on Science by Sweden's Strategic Research Bodies
Science Technology Human Values, October 1, 2005; 30(4): 443 - 467.
[Abstract] [PDF]