This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Klein, H. K. Articles by Kleinman, D. L. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

The Social Construction of Technology: Structural Considerations

Georgia Institute of Technology

Daniel Lee Kleinman

University of Wisconsin-Madison

Although scholarship in the social construction of technology (SCOT) has contributed much to illuminating technological development, most work using this theoretical approach is committed to an agency-centered approach. SCOT scholars have made only limited contributions to illustrating the influence of social structures. In this article, the authors argue for the importance of structural concepts to understanding technological development. They summarize the SCOT conceptual framework defined by Trevor Pinch and Wiebe Bijker and survey some of the methodological and explanatory difficulties that arise with their approach. Then the authors present concepts from organizational sociology and political economy that illuminate structural influences in shaping phenomena of interest to SCOT scholars. These structural concepts can be applied to the study of the design, development, and transformation of technology. The authors conclude that the limited amount of scholarship on structural factors in the social shaping of technological development presents numerous opportunities for research.

Science, Technology & Human Values, Vol. 27, No. 1, 28-52 (2002)
DOI: 10.1177/016224390202700102


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				D.-H. Shin Ubiquitous city: Urban technologies, urban infrastructure and urban informatics Journal of Information Science, October 1, 2009; 35(5): 515 - 526. [Abstract] [PDF]

				J. Abraham and C. Davis Drug evaluation and the permissive principle: continuities and contradictions between standards and practices in antidepressant regulation. Social Studies of Science, August 1, 2009; 39(4): 569 - 598. [Abstract] [PDF]

				E. Popp Berman Why did universities start patenting? Institution-building and the road to the Bayh-Dole Act. Social Studies of Science, December 1, 2008; 38(6): 835 - 871. [Abstract] [PDF]

				Y. Sato Systems Engineering and Contractual Individualism: Linking Engineering Processes to Macro Social Values Social Studies of Science, December 1, 2007; 37(6): 909 - 934. [Abstract] [PDF]

				J. Goven Processes of Inclusion, Cultures of Calculation, Structures of Power: Scientific Citizenship and the Royal Commission on Genetic Modification Science Technology Human Values, September 1, 2006; 31(5): 565 - 598. [Abstract] [PDF]

				S. Hyysalo Representations of Use and Practice-Bound Imaginaries in Automating the Safety of the Elderly Social Studies of Science, August 1, 2006; 36(4): 599 - 626. [Abstract] [PDF]

				A. Hommels Studying Obduracy in the City: Toward a Productive Fusion between Technology Studies and Urban Studies Science Technology Human Values, July 1, 2005; 30(3): 323 - 351. [Abstract] [PDF]