| Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools. |
DOI: 10.1177/0162243903252762 Technical Adversarialism and Participatory Collaboration in the U.S. Chemical Weapons Disposal ProgramUniversity of Nevada-Las Vegas There has been a great deal of theoretical discussion about the merits and faults of greater public involvement in technology policy decisions but comparatively less case-based empirical consideration. This article assesses the theoretical and practical implications of two decision stylestechnical adversarialism and participatory collaborationin decision making on the U.S. Chemical Weapons Disposal Program. This case is useful in that it allows for a longitudinal assessment of these two distinct decision approaches applied to the same policy issue and provides an opportunity to evaluate the differential outcomes produced by each. In addition, the high degree of technical complexity and risk involved offers insight into the role lay citizens can play in even the most complicated technical decisions. Comparing the practical consequences of both decision-making approaches suggests that increasing collaboration among citizens and experts can produce decisions that are both politically viable and technically safer than more insular, adversarial forms.
Key Words: chemical weapons democracy technology collaboration
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
||||||||||||
