Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here to sign up for SAGE Journal Email Alerts today!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Science, Technology & Human Values
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (6)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Bedsworth, L. W.
Right arrow Articles by Kastenberg, W. E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Uncertainty and Regulation: The Rhetoric of Risk in the California Low-Level Radioactive Waste Debate

Louise Wells Bedsworth

University of California, Berkeley

Micah D. Lowenthal

University of California, Berkeley

William E. Kastenberg

University of California, Berkeley

In this article, we analyze the intractability of the low-level radioactive waste debate in California through the construction and examination of policy frames and their associated policy narratives. Relying primarily on reports, formal comments, and written correspondence, we reconstruct three policy frames and explore their interaction in the public debate through the policy stories told by the actors. We analyze how policy actors using these policy frames appropriate available information, value scientific input, and respond to uncertainty in technical and regulatory information to create policy stories. These policy frames and their associated policy narratives demonstrate how policy actors differ in their drivers for action, bases for trusting claims, and response to uncertainty. These differences lead to divergent characterizations of the risk of low-level radio-active waste disposal. This analysis provides insight into the dynamics of intractable policy controversies.

Key Words: risk • uncertainty • decision making • low-level radioactive waste

Science, Technology & Human Values, Vol. 29, No. 3, 406-427 (2004)
DOI: 10.1177/0162243904264904


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Science Technology Human ValuesHome page
E. Leahey
Overseeing Research Practice: The Case of Data Editing
Science Technology Human Values, September 1, 2008; 33(5): 605 - 630.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Science Technology Human ValuesHome page
L. Levidow, J. Murphy, and S. Carr
Recasting "Substantial Equivalence":Transatlantic Governance of GM Food
Science Technology Human Values, January 1, 2007; 32(1): 26 - 64.
[Abstract] [PDF]