This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in Web of Science Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Web of Science (37) Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Rowe, G. Articles by Frewer, L. J. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Evaluating Public-Participation Exercises: A Research Agenda

Institute of Food Research

Lynn J. Frewer

Wageningen University

The concept of public participation is one of growing interest in the UK and elsewhere, with a commensurate growth in mechanisms to enable this. The merits of participation, however, are difficult to ascertain, as there are relatively few cases in which the effectiveness of participation exercises have been studied in a structured (as opposed to highly subjective) manner. This seems to stem largely from uncertainty in the research community as to how to conduct evaluations. In this article, one agenda for conducting evaluation research that might lead to the systematic acquisition of knowledge is presented. This agenda identifies the importance of defining effectiveness and of operationalizing one’s definition (i.e., developing appropriate measurement instruments and processes). The article includes analysis of the nature of past evaluations, discussion of potential difficulties in the enactment of the proposed agenda, and discussion of some potential solutions.

Key Words: public participation • evaluation • effectiveness • research agenda

Science, Technology & Human Values, Vol. 29, No. 4, 512-556 (2004)
DOI: 10.1177/0162243903259197


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				M. Harvey Drama, Talk, and Emotion: Omitted Aspects of Public Participation Science Technology Human Values, March 1, 2009; 34(2): 139 - 161. [Abstract] [PDF]

				K. P. Corbett "You've Got it, You May Have it, You Haven't Got it": Multiplicity, Heterogeneity, and the Unintended Consequences of HIV-related Tests Science Technology Human Values, January 1, 2009; 34(1): 102 - 125. [Abstract] [PDF]

				R. P. J. M. Raven, E. Heiskanen, R. Lovio, M. Hodson, and B. Brohmann The Contribution of Local Experiments and Negotiation Processes to Field-Level Learning in Emerging (Niche) Technologies: Meta-Analysis of 27 New Energy Projects in Europe Bulletin of Science Technology Society, December 1, 2008; 28(6): 464 - 477. [Abstract] [PDF]

				J. C. Besley, V. L. Kramer, Qingjiang Yao, and C. Toumey Interpersonal Discussion Following Citizen Engagement About Nanotechnology: What, If Anything, Do They Say? Science Communication, December 1, 2008; 30(2): 209 - 235. [Abstract] [PDF]

				J. Chilvers Deliberating Competence: Theoretical and Practitioner Perspectives on Effective Participatory Appraisal Practice Science Technology Human Values, May 1, 2008; 33(3): 421 - 451. [Abstract] [PDF]

				M. Lengwiler Participatory Approaches in Science and Technology: Historical Origins and Current Practices in Critical Perspective Science Technology Human Values, March 1, 2008; 33(2): 186 - 200. [Abstract] [PDF]

				J. Chilvers Deliberating Competence: Theoretical and Practitioner Perspectives on Effective Participatory Appraisal Practice Science Technology Human Values, March 1, 2008; 33(2): 155 - 185. [Abstract] [PDF]

				R. Evans and A. Plows Listening Without Prejudice?: Re-discovering the Value of the Disinterested Citizen Social Studies of Science, December 1, 2007; 37(6): 827 - 853. [Abstract] [PDF]

				G. Rowe, T. Horlick-Jones, J. Walls, and N. Pidgeon Difficulties in evaluating public engagement initiatives: reflections on an evaluation of the UK GM Nation? public debate about transgenic crops Public Understanding of Science, October 1, 2005; 14(4): 331 - 352. [Abstract] [PDF]

				M. Gross and H. Hoffmann-Riem Ecological restoration as a real-world experiment: designing robust implementation strategies in an urban environment Public Understanding of Science, July 1, 2005; 14(3): 269 - 284. [Abstract] [PDF]

				M. Gross and W. Krohn Society as experiment: sociological foundations for a self-experimental society History of the Human Sciences, May 1, 2005; 18(2): 63 - 86. [Abstract] [PDF]

				G. Rowe and L. J. Frewer A Typology of Public Engagement Mechanisms Science Technology Human Values, April 1, 2005; 30(2): 251 - 290. [Abstract] [PDF]