This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in ISI Web of Science Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (23) Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Rowe, G. Articles by Frewer, L. J. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                   What's this?

A Typology of Public Engagement Mechanisms

Institute of Food Research

Lynn J. Frewer

University of Wageningen

Imprecise definition of key terms in the "public participation" domain have hindered the conduct of good research and militated against the development and implementation of effective participation practices. In this article, we define key concepts in the domain: public communication, public consultation, and public participation. These concepts are differentiated according to the nature and flow of information between exercise sponsors and participants. According to such an information flow perspective, an exercise’s effectiveness may be ascertained by the efficiency with which full, relevant information is elicited from all appropriate sources, transferred to (and processed by) all appropriate recipients, and combined(when required) to give an aggregate/consensual response. Key variables that may theoretically affect effectiveness—and on which engagement mechanisms differ—are identified and used to develop a typology of mechanisms. The resultant typology reveals four communication, six consultation, and four participation mechanism classes. Limitations to the typology are discussed, and future research needs identified.

Key Words: public participation • public engagement • participation mechanisms • typology • mechanism variables

CiteULike    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				A. Blok Experts on public trial: on democratizing expertise through a Danish consensus conference Public Understanding of Science, April 1, 2007; 16(2): 163 - 182. [Abstract] [PDF]

				G. Rowe, T. Horlick-Jones, J. Walls, and N. Pidgeon Difficulties in evaluating public engagement initiatives: reflections on an evaluation of the UK GM Nation? public debate about transgenic crops Public Understanding of Science, October 1, 2005; 14(4): 331 - 352. [Abstract] [PDF]