This Article Abstract Free Full Text (Free PDF) Free Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in Web of Science Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Hine, C. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Multi-sited Ethnography as a Middle Range Methodology for Contemporary STS

University of Surrey

The paper draws its inspiration from the provocation which Merton offered sociology both to engage with empirical data and to perform analyses adequate to guide intervention beyond the particular case. Whilst contemporary STS is very different both in its models of theory and its forms of methodology, this paper suggests Merton's concerns with engagement and adequacy provide a useful way to interrogate current approaches. Specifically, the paper explores some recent anthropological conceptions of ethnographic fieldwork that have provided potent models for the study of scientific and technological cultures. These multi-sited approaches have also provided the opportunity to develop new notions of intervention and explore alternative ways of making contributions to development of theory and practice. In the process of pursuing the goals of engagement and adequacy notions of ethnography have however become stretched. This sense of detachment from methodological canons accentuates the need for methodological debate and skill-sharing in STS.

Key Words: ethnography • laboratory • multi-sited • intervention • middle range

References

• Amit, V., ed. 2000. Constructing the field: Ethnographic fieldwork in the contemporary world. London: Routledge.
• Bruni, A. 2005. Shadowing software and clinical records: On the ethnography of non-humans and heterogeneous contexts. Organization 12(3): 357-378.[Abstract]
• Burawoy, M., ed. 2000. Global ethnography: Forces, connections and imaginations in a postmodern world. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
• Collins, H.M. 1985. Changing order: replication and induction in scientific practice. London: Sage.
• Collins, H. 2004. Gravity's shadow: the search for gravitational waves. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
• de Laet, M.K., and A. Mol. 2000. The Zimbabwe bush pump: Mechanics of a fluid technology. Social Studies of Science 30(2): 225-263.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
• Golinski, J. 1998. Making natural knowledge: Constructivism and the history of science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
• Hammersley, M. 1990. What's wrong with ethnography: The myth of theoretical description. Sociology 24(4): 597-615.[Abstract]
• Heath, D. 1997. Bodies, antibodies, and modest interventions. In Cyborgs and citadels: Anthropological interventions in emerging science and technologies, edited by G.L. Downey and J. Dumit, 67-82. Santa Fe: School of American Research Press.
• Heath, D. 2000. Biocultural informatics: Doing anthropology of genetics in vivo and in silico. Available fromhttp://virtualsociety.sbs.ox.ac.uk/events/GRkey.htm (accessed October 1, 2005).
• Heath, D., E. Koch, B. Ley, and M. Montoya. 1999. Nodes and queries: Linking locations in networked fields of inquiry. American Behavioral Scientist 43: 450-463.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
• Henriksen, D.L. 2002. Locating virtual field sites and a dispersed object of research. Scandinavian Journal of Information Systems 14(2): 31-45.
• Hess, D.J. 2001. Ethnography and the development of science and technology studies. In Sage handbook of ethnography, edited by P. Atkinson, A. Coffey, S. Delamont, J. Lofland, and L. Lofland, 234-245. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
• Hine, C. 2000. Virtual ethnography. London: Sage.
• Hine, C. Forthcoming. 2008. Systematics as cyberscience: Computers, change and continuity in science. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
• Jensen, C.B. 2004. Researching partially existing objects: What is an electronic patient record? Where do you find it? How do you study it? Centre for STS Studies, Aarhus, Working paper 4. Available from http://imv.au.dk/sts/arbejdspapirer/WP4.pdf (accessed October 1, 2005).
• Keating, P., A. Cambrosio, and M. Mackenzie. 1992. The tools of the discipline: Standards, models and measures in the affinity/avidity controversy in immunology. In The right tools for the job: at work in twentieth-century life sciences, edited by A. E. Clarke and J. H. Fujimura, 312-354. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
• Knorr-Cetina, K. 1999. Epistemic cultures: How the sciences make knowledge. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
• Latour, B. 1983. Give me a laboratory and I will raise the world. In Science observed, Perspectives on the social study of science, edited by K. D. Knorr-Cetina and M. Mulkay, 141-170. London, Sage.
• Latour, B. 1999. Pandora's hope: Essays on the reality of science studies. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
• Latour, B., and S. Woolgar. 1986. Laboratory life: The construction of scientific facts. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
• Law, J. 2004. After method: Mess in social science research. London: Routledge.
• Law, J., and A. Mol. 2001. Situating technoscience: An inquiry into spatialities. Environment and Planning D: Society & Space 19(5): 609-621.[CrossRef][Web of Science]
• Law, J., and J. Urry. 2004. Enacting the social. Economy and Society 33(3): 390-410.[CrossRef][Web of Science]
• Loseke, D.R., and S.E. Cahill. 1999. Reflections on classifying ethnographic reflections at the millennium's turn. Journal of Contemporary Ethnography 28(5): 437-441.[Free Full Text]
• Marcus, G. 1995. Ethnography in/of the world system: The emergence of multi-sited ethnography. Annual Review of Anthropology 24: 95-117.[CrossRef][Web of Science]
• Marcus, G. 1998. Ethnography through thick and thin. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
• Martin, E. 1994. Flexible bodies: The role of immunity in American culture from the days of polio to the age of AIDS. Boston: Beacon Press.
• Merton, R. 1969. Social theory and social structure, enlarged edition. New York: The Free Press.
• Mol, A. 2002. The body multiple: Ontology in medical practice. Durham, N.C.: Duke University Press.
• Rouse, J. 1993. What are cultural studies of scientific knowledge? Configurations 1(1): 1-22.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
• Sismondo, S. 2004. An introduction to science and technology studies. Malden, MA: Blackwell.
• Stanley, L. 1990. Doing ethnography, writing ethnography: A comment on Hammersley. Sociology 24(4): 617-627.[CrossRef][Web of Science]
• Star, S.L. 1999. The ethnography of infrastructure. American Behavioral Scientist 43(3): 377-391.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
• Urry, J. 2000. Sociology beyond societies: Mobilities for the twenty-first century. London: Routledge.
• Zuiderent, T. 2002. Blurring the center: On the politics of ethnography. Scandinavian Journal of Information Systems 14(2): 59-78.

This version was published on November 1, 2007

Science, Technology & Human Values, Vol. 32, No. 6, 652-671 (2007)
DOI: 10.1177/0162243907303598


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				M. P. Jones Entrepreneurial Science: The Rules of the Game Social Studies of Science, December 1, 2009; 39(6): 821 - 851. [Abstract] [PDF]

This Article Abstract Free Full Text (Free PDF) Free Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in Web of Science Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Hine, C. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                         What's this?