Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here to sign up for SAGE Journal Email Alerts today!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Science, Technology & Human Values
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Free Full Text (Free PDF) Free
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (1)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Beaulieu, A.
Right arrow Articles by Wouters, P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Not Another Case Study

A Middle-Range Interrogation of Ethnographic Case Studies in the Exploration of E-science

Anne Beaulieu

Virtual Knowledge Studios, Royal Netherlands Academy of Arts and Sciences

Andrea Scharnhorst

Virtual Knowledge Studios, Royal Netherlands Academy of Arts and Sciences

Paul Wouters

Virtual Knowledge Studios, Royal Netherlands Academy of Arts and Sciences

This article addresses the need to problematize "cases" in science and technology studies (STS) work, as a middle-range theory issue. The focus is not on any one case study per se, but on why case studies exist and endure in STS. Case studies are part of a specific problematization in the field. We therefore explore relations between motivation for the use of cases (especially ethnographic ones), their constitution, and ways they can be invoked to make particular kinds of arguments in STS. We set out to examine the case as an object that links together research practices, intellectual debates, and programmatic concerns in our own work. Based on our experiences and on this reflection on the links between cases and questions in STS, we propose a number of casemaking strategies that shift and enrich the deployment of ethnographic cases as an epistemic tool in STS.

Key Words: ethnography • modeling • theory • reflexivity • interdisciplinarity • epistemic cultures

References

  • Albert, R., and A.L. Barabasi. 2002. Statistical mechanics of complex networks. Reviews of Modern Physics 74 (1): 47-97.
  • Ankeny, R. 2007. Model organisms as case-based reasoning: Worms in contemporary biomedical science. In Science without laws: Model systems, cases, and exemplary narratives, ed. A. N. H. Creager, E. Lunbeck, and M. N. Wise. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
  • Beaulieu, A. 2004. Mediating ethnography: Objectivity and the making of ethnographies of the Internet. Social Epistemology 18 (2/3): 139-64.[CrossRef]
  • ———. 2005. Sociable hyperlinks: An ethnographic approach to connectivity. In Virtual methods: Issues in social research on the Internet, ed. C. Hine, 183-98. Oxford: Berg Publishers.
  • Beaulieu, A., and E. Simakova. 2006. Textured connectivity: An ethnographic approach to understanding the timescape of hyperlinks. Cybermetrics 10 (1). Available from http://www.cindoc.csic.es/cybermetrics/vol10iss1.html (accessed December 1, 2006).
  • Berg, M., and A. Mol, eds. 1998. Differences in medicine: Unraveling practices, techniques, and bodies. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
  • Bijker, W.E. 1995. Of bicycles, bakelites, and bulbs: Toward a theory of sociotechnical change. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  • Bos, J. 2004. Everyday life objectivity. Social Epistemology 18 (2/3): 123-38.[CrossRef]
  • Bowker, G., and S.L. Star. 1999. Sorting things out: Classification and its consequences. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  • Brown, N. 2005. Home on the (mid-) range—Some notes on theory in STS. Paper presented at the workshop Middle Range Theories in Science and Technology Studies, Amsterdam, April 27-29.
  • Brown, N., and M. Michael. 2003. A sociology of expectations: Retrospecting prospects and prospecting retrospects. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management 15 (1): 3-18.[CrossRef][Web of Science]
  • Campbell, N.D. 2004. Credible performances: The performativity of science studies. Social Studies of Science 34 (3): 433-42.[Free Full Text]
  • Chattoe, E., and N. Gilbert. 2001. Understanding consumption: What interviews with retired households can reveal about budgetary decisions. Sociological Research Online 6 (3). Available from http://www.socresonline.org.uk/6/3/chattoe.html (accessed December 1, 2006).
  • Collins, H.M., and R. Evans. 2002. The third wave of science studies: Studies of expertise and experience. Social Studies of Science 32 (2): 235-96.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  • Constable, N. 2003. Romance on a global stage: Pen pals, virtual ethnography, and "mail-order" marriages. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
  • De Laet, M.K., and A. Mol. 2000. The Zimbabwe bush pump: Mechanics of a fluid technology. Social Studies of Science 30 (2): 225-63.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  • Dumit, J. 2004. Picturing personhood: Brain scans and biomedical identity. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
  • Epstein, J.M., and R. Axtell. 1996. Growing artificial societies: Social science from bottom up. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  • Fisher, M.M.J., and G.E. Marcus. 1986. Anthropology as cultural critique: An experimental moment in the human sciences. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
  • Foot, K.A., S.M. Schneider, M. Dougherty, M. Xenos, and E. Larsen. 2003. Analyzing linking practices: Candidate sites in the 2002 U.S. electoral Web sphere. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication 8 (4). Available from http://www.jcmc.indiana.edu/vol8/issue4/foot.html (accessed December 1, 2006).
  • Franklin, S., C. Lury, and J. Stacey. 2000. Global nature, global culture. New York: Sage.
  • Galison, P. 1997. Image and logic: A material culture of microphysics. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
  • Galison, P., and D. J. Stump, eds. 1996. The disunity of science: Boundaries, contexts, and power. Palo Alto, CA: Stanford University Press.
  • Geels, F. 2007. Feelings of discontent and the promise of middle range theory for STS: Examples from technology dynamics. Science, Technology, & Human Values 32(6).
  • Gomart, E. 2002. Methadone: Six effects in search of a substance. Social Studies of Science 32 (1): 93-135.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  • Hagendijk, R. and J. Meeus. 1993. Blind faith: Fact, fiction and fraud in public controversy over science. Public Understanding of Science 2(4): 391-415.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  • Heintz, B., M. Merz, and C. Schumacher. 2004. Wissenschaft, die Grenzen schafft. Bielefeld: transcript Verlag.
  • Hellsten, I., L. Leydesdorff, and P. Wouters. 2006. Multiple presents: How search engines re-write the past. New Media & Society 8 (6): 901-24.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  • Hine, C. 2007. Multi-sited ethnography as a middle range methodology for contemporary STS. Science, Technology, & Human Values 32(6).
  • Hine, C., ed. 2005. Virtual methods: Issues in social research on the Internet: Oxford: Berg Publishers.
  • Howard, P. 2002. Network ethnography and the hypermedia organization: New organizations, new media, new methods. New Media & Society 4 (4): 551-75.
  • Huberman, B.A. 2001. The laws of the Web: Patterns in the ecology of information. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  • Ingwersen, P. 1998. The calculation of Web impact factors. Journal of Documentation 54 (2): 236-43.[CrossRef][Web of Science]
  • Jensen, C., and R. Markussen. 2001. Marup church and the politics of hybridization: On complexities of choice. Social Studies of Science 31 (6): 795-819.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  • King, N. 2002. Security, disease, commerce: Ideologies of postcolonial global health. Social Studies of Science 32 (5/6): 763-89.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  • Knorr-Cetina, K. 1981. The manufacture of knowledge: An essay on the constructivist and contextual nature of science. Oxford: Pergamon.
  • ———. 1999. Epistemic cultures: How the sciences make knowledge. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
  • Krohn, W., G. Küppers, and H. Nowotny. 1990. Selforganization: Portrait of a scientific revolution. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publisher.
  • Latour, B. 1988. The pasteurization of France. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
  • Latour, B., and S. Woolgar. 1986. Laboratory life: The construction of scientific facts. 2nd ed. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
  • Law, J., and A. Mol. 2003. Situating technoscience: An inquiry into spatialities. Centre for Science Studies, Lancaster University, Lancaster. Available from http://www.lancs.ac.uk/fss/sociology/research/resalph.htm#law (accessed December 1, 2006).
  • Lewenstein, B.V. 1995. Do public electronic bulletin boards help create scientific knowledge? The cold-fusion case. Science, Technology, & Human Values 20 (2): 123-49.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  • Lynch, M. 1991. Laboratory space and the technological complex: An investigation of topical contextures. Science in Context 4(1): 51-78.
  • Mackenzie, A. 2002. Transductions: Bodies and machines at speed. New York: Continuum Press.
  • ———. 2003. These things called systems: Collective imaginings and infrastructural software. Social Studies of Science 33 (3): 365-87.[Abstract]
  • Mainzer, K. 1997. Thinking in complexity. 3rd ed. Berlin: Springer.
  • Martin, B. 1988. Analyzing the fluoridation controversy: Resources and structures. Social Studies of Science 18 (2): 331-63.[Abstract]
  • Maynard, D.W., and N.C. Schaeffer. 2000. Towards a sociology of social scientific knowledge: Survey research and ethnomethodology's asymmetric alternates. Social Studies of Science 30 (3): 323-70.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  • Mialet, H. 1999. Do angels have bodies? Two stories about subjectivity in science: The cases of William X and Mister H. Social Studies of Science 29 (4): 551-81.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  • Morgan, M. 2006. When "facts" travel free? Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Society for Social Studies of Science, Vancouver, Canada, November 1-5.
  • Mortensen, T., and J. Walker. 2002. Blogging thoughts: Personal publication as an online research tool. In Researching ICTs in context. Available from http://www.intermedia.uio.no/konferanser/skikt-02/docs/Researching_ICTs_in_context-Ch11-Mortensen-Walker.pdf (accessed December 1, 2006).
  • Newman, S. 1998. Here, there and nowhere at all: Distribution, negotiation and virtuality in postmodern ethnography and engineering. Knowledge and Society 11:235-67.
  • Oudshoorn, N., and T. Pinch, eds. 2003. How users matter: The co-construction of users and technology. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  • Park, H., and M. Thelwall. 2003. Hyperlink analyses of the World Wide Web: A review. Journal of Computer Mediated Communication 8 (4). Available from http://www.jcmc.indiana.edu/vol8/issue4/park.html (accessed December 1, 2006).
  • Pels, D. 2003. Unhastening science: Autonomy and reflexivity in the social theory of knowledge. Liverpool, UK: Liverpool University Press.
  • Rabinow, P. 2003. Anthropos today: Reflections on modern equipment. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
  • Rogers, R. 2002. Operating issue networks. Science as Culture 11 (2): 191-213.[CrossRef]
  • Ruhleder, K. 1995. Reconstructing artifacts, reconstructing work: From textual edition to online data-bank. Science, Technology, & Human Values 20 (1): 39-64.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  • Scharnhorst, A., and P. Wouters. 2006. Web indications: A new generation of S&T indicators? Cybermetrics 10 (1). Available from http://www.cindoc.csic.es/cybermetrics/vol10iss1.html (accessed December 1, 2006).
  • Schlecker, M., and E. Hirsch. 2001. Incomplete knowledge: Ethnography and the crisis of context in studies of media, science and technology. History of the Human Sciences 14 (1): 69-87.
  • Schneider, S., and K. Foot. 2005. Web sphere analysis: An approach to studying online action. In Virtual methods: Issues in social research on the Internet, ed. C. Hine, 157-170. Oxford: Berg Publishers.
  • Shapin, S., and S. Schaffer. 1985. Leviathan and the air pump: Hobbes, Boyle and the experimental life. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
  • Sims, B. 1999. Concrete practices: Testing in an earthquake-engineering laboratory. Social Studies of Science 29 (4): 483-518.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  • Star, S.L. 1999. The ethnography of infrastructure. American Behavioral Scientist 43 (3): 377-91.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  • Suchman, L.A. 1987. Plans and situated actions: The problem of human machine interaction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Thurk, J., and G.A. Fine. 2003. The problem of tools: Technology and the sharing of knowledge. Acta Sociologica 46 (2): 107-17.[Abstract]
  • Timmermans, S. 2003. A black technician and blue babies. Social Studies of Science 33 (2): 197-229.[Abstract]
  • Traweek, S. 1988. Beamtimes and lifetimes: The world of high energy physics. London: Harvard University Press.
  • Tsing, A.L. 2005. Friction: An ethnography of global connection. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
  • Turner, R.S. 2001. On telling regulatory tales: rBST comes to Canada. Social Studies of Science 31 (4): 475-506.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  • Van Oost, E. 2003. Materialized gender: How shavers configure the users' femininity and masculinity. In How users matter: The co-construction of users and technology, ed. N. Oudshoorn and T. Pinch, 193-208. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  • Voskuhl, A. 2004. Humans, machines, and conversations: An ethnographic study of the making of automatic speech recognition technologies. Social Studies of Science 34 (3): 393-421.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  • Waterton, C. 2002. From field to fantasy: Classifying nature, constructing Europe. Social Studies of Science 32 (2): 177-204.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  • Weick, K.E. 1974. Middle-range theories of social systems. Behavioral Science 19 (6): 357-67.[CrossRef][Web of Science]
  • Wouters, P., and A. Beaulieu. 2006. Imagining e-science beyond computation. In New infrastructures for knowledge production: Understanding e-science, ed. C. Hine, 48-70. Hershey, PA: Idea Group.
  • Wyatt, S., and B. Balmer. 2007. Home on the range: What and where is the middle in science and technology studies? Science, Technology, & Human Values 32(6).
  • Wyatt, S. 2004. Danger! Metaphors at work in economics, geophysiology, and the Internet. Science, Technology, & Human Values 29 (2): 242-61.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  • ———. 2007. Technological determinism is dead; long live technological determinism. In New handbook of science, technology and society, ed. E. Hackett, O. Amsterdamska, M. Lynch, and J. Wajcman, 165-80. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  • Yearley, S. 2005. Making sense of science: Understanding the social study of science. London: Sage.
  • Zuiderent-Jerak, T. 2007. Intervening in health care. PhD diss., Institute of Health Policy and Management, Erasmus University Rotterdam, The Netherlands.

This version was published on November 1, 2007

Science, Technology & Human Values, Vol. 32, No. 6, 672-692 (2007)
DOI: 10.1177/0162243907306188
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?



This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Free Full Text (Free PDF) Free
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (1)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Beaulieu, A.
Right arrow Articles by Wouters, P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?