This Article Full Text (OnlineFirst PDF) All Versions of this Article: 0162243907312954v1 34/1/55    most recent Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Struhkamp, R. Articles by Swierstra, T. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Dealing with Independence: Doctoring in Physical Rehabilitation Practice

University of Twente, Faculty of Behavioral Sciences

^* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: struhkamp{at}hotmail.com.

	Abstract

By now, the laboratory tradition, crafting transportable knowledge that allows for comparison, has been amply studied. However, other knowledge traditions, notably that of the clinic, deserve further articulation. The authors contribute to this by unraveling some specificities of rehabilitation practice. How do laboratory and clinical traditions in rehabilitation relate to independence? The first seeks to quantify people’s independence; the latter attends to qualitatively different ways of being independent. While measuring independence is a matter of aggregating scores on a priori established dimensions, clinical rehabilitation concerns coordinating different ways of being independent. While independence scales map a linear development in time, rehabilitation participants juggle with time, including uncertain futures in their present. In clinical practice, then, independence is neither a single, coherent, fact nor a clear-cut, stable goal. Instead, professionals as well as patients work by creatively doctoring with the large variety of elements that are relevant to daily life with long-term disabilities.

First published on February 7, 2008, doi:10.1177/0162243907312954

Science, Technology & Human Values 2009;34:55.

A more recent version of this article appeared on January 1, 2009


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				S. van Twillert, K. Postema, J. H. Geertzen, T. Hemminga, and A. T Lettinga Improving rehabilitation treatment in a local setting: a case study of prosthetic rehabilitation Clinical Rehabilitation, October 1, 2009; 23(10): 938 - 947. [Abstract] [PDF]