This Article Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Faulkner, W. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                   What's this?

The Power and the Pleasure? A Research Agenda for "Making Gender Stick" to Engineers

University of Edinburgh, Scotland

This article seeks to open up a new avenue for feminist technology studies—gender-aware research on engineers and engineering practice—on the grounds that engineers are powerful symbols of the equation between masculinity and technology and occupy significant roles in shaping new technologies. Drawing on the disparate evidence available, the author explores four themes. The first asks why the equation between masculinity and technology is so durable when there are such huge mismatches between image and practice. The second examines this mismatch in the detail of engineering knowledge and practice to reveal that fractured and contradictory constructions of masculinity frequently coexist. The third theme addresses the suggestion that women and men might bring different styles to engineering. Finally, the author explores subjective experiences of engineering to argue that engineers' shared pleasures in and identification with technology both define what it means to be an engineer and provide appealing symbols of power that act to compensate for a perceived lack of power or competence in other arenas.

CiteULike    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				W. Faulkner `Nuts and Bolts and People': Gender-Troubled Engineering Identities Social Studies of Science, June 1, 2007; 37(3): 331 - 356. [Abstract] [PDF]

				I. Moser Sociotechnical Practices and Difference: On the Interferences between Disability, Gender, and Class Science Technology Human Values, September 1, 2006; 31(5): 537 - 564. [Abstract] [PDF]

				S. Wyatt, F. Henwood, A. Hart, and J. Smith The digital divide, health information and everyday life New Media Society, April 1, 2005; 7(2): 199 - 218. [Abstract] [PDF]

				M. Lohan and W. Faulkner Masculinities and Technologies: Some Introductory Remarks Men and Masculinities, April 1, 2004; 6(4): 319 - 329. [PDF]

				U. MellstrOm Machines and Masculine Subjectivity: Technology as an Integral Part of Men's Life Experiences Men and Masculinities, April 1, 2004; 6(4): 368 - 382. [Abstract] [PDF]

				L. M. Frehill The Gendered Construction of the Engineering Profession in the United States, 1893-1920 Men and Masculinities, April 1, 2004; 6(4): 383 - 403. [Abstract] [PDF]

				N. Oudshoorn, E. Rommes, and M. Stienstra Configuring the User as Everybody: Gender and Design Cultures in Information and Communication Technologies Science Technology Human Values, January 1, 2004; 29(1): 30 - 63. [Abstract] [PDF]

				H. Harbers The Womb as Operation Room: Feminist Technology Studies without "Failures of Nerve" Science Technology Human Values, July 1, 2003; 28(3): 425 - 434. [PDF]

				T. Kleif and W. Faulkner "I'm No Athlete [but] I Can Make This Thing Dance!"--Men's Pleasures in Technology Science Technology Human Values, April 1, 2003; 28(2): 296 - 325. [Abstract] [PDF]

				J. Jorgenson Engineering Selves: Negotiating Gender and Identity in Technical Work Management Communication Quarterly, February 1, 2002; 15(3): 350 - 380. [Abstract] [PDF]